Sunday, October 28, 2012

Super-Storm Sandy: Obama's October Surprise?

For the past few days now, all we've been hearing about is this Super-Storm Sandy wandering its way up the East Coast. It's been all over the news, radio, Internet etc. To say the media's really hyping this storm would be an understatement. Frankly, I don't remember the last time meteorologists have had such a dooming tone to their forecasts. You would think Armageddon was imminent.

But even though I've been hearing about this storm for days, it wasn't until today (Sunday, October 28th) that I thought about the timing of the storm (about a week before one of the biggest presidential elections in history). Sandy comes just in time to counteract all the momentum Romney has been gaining on the campaign trail. With the media placing its main focus on the super-storm and its aftermath, Romney's campaign is going to lose all the attention it's been getting while Obama is going to come forward as the "savior" in this time of national disaster. Yes, this impending national disaster could be the one thing Obama's campaign needs in order to guarantee a victory over Romney; history has shown time and time again that citizens usually rally around their current leader in a time of crisis (think Bush after 9/11). So could the timing of this "perfect storm" be any more perfect? Is it just a coincidence???

Of course, most people would look at super-storm Sandy and say, "Well, it seems like perfect timing, but we're talking about mother-nature here and you can't 'time' mother-nature." Well, what if it's possible that this super-storm Sandy ISN'T a product of mother-nature? What if it's possible that the worst storm in a hundred years may actually be man?

Yes, I know this may sound very fantastical and, to be honest, I HOPE this storm is, indeed, a product of mother-nature, but I would be remiss if I failed to remind people that weather-control is a very real phenomenon; in fact, it's been possible for scientists to control the weather since the 1960s. All you have to do is type 'weather-control' into a search engine and you can read all about the phenomenon. There are fields of antennas around the globe (HAARP in Alaska being one of them) and they can ionize the air with electromagnetic waves, creating electrons that attract dust; moisture condenses around this dust and then produces clouds/storms. This means man can essentially play mother-nature - create storms, manipulate them, strengthen them, weaken them and even guide their pathways. Read more about weather-manipulation HERE.

Now, I really hope super-storm Sandy is not a desperate attempt by the Obama administration to deal the final blow to a Romney campaign that has been gaining more and more strength over the past few weeks. That would be one evil 'October surprise' and it makes me sick to think that such a thing could even be possible. But the reality of the matter is that storm engineering IS very possible and the perfect timing of this perfect storm smells fishy and looks kind of ugly to me.

Before I sign off, I need to make it clear that I am not pro-Romney or anti-Obama (I don't even know who I'm going to vote for, if I vote) so don't interpret this blog as a jab at any particular presidential candidate. In fact, I'm not completely sure the storm - if it IS a man-made "October surprise" - would be Obama's surprise, as it could possibly be an attempt by Romney's camp to delay the election, giving him more time to win more votes. But, then again, I would think that it would be only Obama's administration who would have access to HAARP-like devices, so the possibility of Sandy being Romney's surprise seems less likely, although still possible. Either way, I encourage you to do your own research on weather control and you can be the judge of what may be going on.

For more info on weather control: (former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura's documentary on HAARP)

Wednesday, October 17, 2012


The following is a book review I recently wrote and posted on Amazon. Click HERE to learn more about the book. I highly recommend reading it:

BY LOVE RECLAIMED: JEAN HARLOW RETURNS TO CLEAR HER HUSBAND'S NAME is a book that provides in-depth insight into the possibility of reincarnation and past-lives, but this is also a book that provides perhaps one of the most accurate accounts of the "Golden Age" of Hollywood ever recorded. Why is it so accurate? Because the story is told by people who not only WERE there (Jean Harlow and Paul Bern) but - with the help of past-life regression - by people who actually ARE there. Yes, the experience of past-life regression is like going into a time machine and studying events played out in real-time, which is something that a historian has never quite been able to do (how else can you write about events without looking at them in retrospect?) In this sense, BY LOVE RECLAIMED is arguably one of the most truthful memoirs about Hollywood ever written! It doesn't capture reality as it was remembered; it captures reality as it actually happened.

But before I get ahead of myself here, let me just provide a quick synopsis of the book:

Through the process of deep hypnosis performed by Dr. Adrian Finkelstein MD., Valerie Franich M.Ed. (a behavioral health specialist living in Washington State) is regressed to her recent past life in Hollywood as Jean Harlow. Through the regression process, Harlow deconstructs the absurd unreality of Hollywood history as we know it. She gives readers the skinny on what REALLY went on during the Golden Age of Hollywood (which, as it turns out, wasn't so 'Golden'), specifically focusing on the mysterious death of her husband: MGM studio executive/producer/director Paul Bern (whom we find out - halfway through the story - is serendipitously incarnated in the person of Franich's therapist Dr. Finkelstein).

On the morning of September 5, 1932, Bern was discovered dead from a gunshot wound in his Benedict Canyon home (9820 Easton Drive, which would later become the location for the Manson murders). Fearing that a scandal could break out that would damage Jean Harlow's image, Louis B. Mayer - head of MGM - covered up the murder, manipulating the evidence so that it would look like a suicide. Mayer then contrived a fictitious narrative about how Paul Bern was a wife-beater who suffered from impotence and was so ashamed of himself that he ended his life. This story was a complete fabrication, although it was written into the Hollywood history books as fact. And now Jean Harlow - presently incarnated in the person of Valerie Franich - has come back to set the record straight. This is what BY LOVE RECLAIMED is mainly about: clearing Bern's name.

Of course, it's easy for the reader to walk away from this story casting harsh judgment on Mayer and the other key players at MGM who were involved in the cover-up (including one of Bern's good friends Irving Thalberg). But Dr. Finkelstein - while speaking as Paul Bern under hypnosis - makes a point to say that he now FORGIVES everybody who was involved in covering up his death. He knows that Mayer was looking out for the interests of his studio, because in Hollywood it was all about making money and beating out the competition. Harlow, after all, was MGM's biggest moneymaker at the time of Bern's death and a scandal involving her could have meant MGM's financial ruin. Of course, this doesn't excuse Mayer's actions in the least but it merely attempts to empathize with them. As we learn in the book, part of the reason why Bern decided to incarnate as a psychologist in his next life (as Finkelstein) was to try and understand why people do what they could good people be coerced into doing things so ugly and awful? There are many reasons: concern about money/power, fear etc., and WE ALL have these types of concerns to at least some degree. Yes, we are all potentially subject to being ruled by these concerns, and we're all potentially capable of committing unsavory acts when these concerns get the better of us.

In fact, one of the main themes of the book (as stated by Finkelstein towards the end) is that acknowledging reincarnation and studying past-lives may be integral to bringing more love, forgiveness, understanding, respect and tolerance into the world. Once we realize that we have all been in a dichotomy of life situations - playing the role of the abuser and the abused, the victim and the victimizer, manipulated by or have overcome fear/concern for money - it's all the easier to FORGIVE others because we understand where people are coming from and realize we could have easily done the same ourselves. It's more difficult to look down on a person's actions and say "how stupid" or "how mean" or "how evil" when we understand that they may be at a certain level of soul development that we could have also been at a few incarnations ago. In other words, judging a person harshly according to their actions would be hypocritical since we were probably in the same underdeveloped spiritual state - if not in our current life - then maybe several lives ago.

Maybe it's this understanding of soul development - a spiritual growth that occurs over a period of several human incarnations - that will (at least partially) become what the future of the human race depends on for its survival. There will be less hatred towards others. More forgiveness. Less judgment...more understanding...and tolerance. In a world where wars break out as frequently as cold viruses, maybe past-life exploration has the potential to heal the human race for the long term. You never know...

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Wait, What Really DID Happen to Charlie Sheen?

I was surfing YouTube the other night and - for whatever reason - I stumbled upon a documentary about a number of high-profile Hollywood people who were publicly questioning the events of 9/11 (watch the documentary HERE). These people (like Mark Ruffalo, Daniel Sunjata, Rosie O'Donnell etc.) are so-called "truthers" who believe that there's a lot of information regarding the events that the government isn't telling us. They point out several of the day's anomalies that raise major eyebrows. For example, why were the black boxes from the hijacked airplanes never found (black boxes are indestructible and are supposedly always found at airplane crash sites)? Why did firemen and other people in the towers hear multiple explosions before and after the planes hit, explosions that came from areas of the building that weren't hit by the planes? Why did building-number-seven fall as though it were a carefully-executed demolition (as expert engineers have claimed)? And if they did decide to "pull it", as the lease-holder of the WTC complex - real-estate developer Larry Silverstein - claimed in an interview, how were they able to set up the demolition so quickly (the building came down around 5:20pm that same afternoon)? Why did the BBC announce Building-Seven's collapse before it even occurred (as seen in this video, the building is still standing in the background while the reporter announces that it has collapsed)? How were nineteen amateur hijackers able to take over four commercial airliners and fly them into such precise targets (many pilots claim that such maneuvering of aircraft is nearly impossible to accomplish)? How did airplane passenger cell phones work at altitudes where there shouldn't have been any cell-phone service? Why did nobody see an actual plane hit the Pentagon? Why was no plane wreckage found at the Pentagon? Why did they confiscate all the surveillance cameras that would have been able to show the plane hitting the Pentagon? These are just SOME of the anomalies. The questions go on and on...

Anyway, between the years 2003 and 2009 Charlie Sheen was one of the most high-profile Hollywood figures leading the 9/11 truth movement. And when I was watching the YouTube documentary the other night (followed by other clips of him speaking on various talk and radio shows), I couldn't believe how rational, intelligent, coherent and - yes - SANE Sheen sounded. He was so cool, smart and charismatic, and he was genuinely concerned/disturbed by what happened on 9/11. Until the other night, I hadn’t even known that Sheen was so active in revealing the truth behind the September attacks. He even went so far as to make a "video message" (watch this video HERE), pleading with President Obama to launch a new, more thorough investigation of what actually happened (the 9/11 Commission overlooked virtually every anomaly of the events). So if Charlie Sheen was so damn intelligent and sound in the mind THEN...what happened to his mind in early 2011? Was he really just partying too much, doing too many drugs, smoking too much crack? Perhaps. Or was it something more???

A very calm, intelligent Charlie Sheen, before the meltdown (watch the Jimmy Kimmel interview at 4:35).

Charlie Sheen's February 2011 "meltdown" was perhaps the most public and sensationalized of all the various celebrity breakdowns we have witnessed over the years. He was all over the TV and Internet, looking twisted out of his mind, spouting such bizarre catchphrases as "winning", "I'm a rock star from Mars", "I've got tiger-blood and Adonis DNA" and "I'm on a drug called Charlie Sheen". Any words of wisdom he had about 9/11 or anything else was immediately discredited. Who would take this "rock-star from Mars" seriously? It would have been very difficult to do so. I mean, people all over the place were making fun of him - practically every late-night talk show host (Jimmy Fallon did a memorable impression that poked fun at him); tabloid news shows; Good Morning America...the View....every media figure was drooling and masturbating at the sight of Charlie's meltdown. He was such an easy target for cheap-shots and exploitation.

But was it just a coincidence that the most vocal, high-profile 9/11 'truther' just so happened to have the most publicized and sensationalized celebrity meltdown in history? Well, allow me to speak hypothetically for a moment. Let's just say you were an elite member of our government trying to cover up a black-op "false flag operation" like what may - just may - have happened on 9/11. Wouldn't the public meltdown of a very vocal, high-profile 'truther' like Charlie Sheen be mighty, mighty convenient for you? Perhaps a little too convenient?

Looking back on the meltdown, it was as if Charlie changed into a completely different person somewhere between 2009 and 2011. He went from such a calm and cool and smart and rational individual (especially when he was pleading with Obama to investigate 9/11 more thoroughly) to such a complete scramble-egg-brained wacko in the winter of 2011. In fact, the more I watched video clips of Sheen speaking so intelligently about 9/11 previous to 2009, the more it suddenly occurred to me that the highest paid television star in Hollywood may have been the victim of some kind of government mind-control operation, one that would essentially turn him into a wacko and discredit him to the point where nobody would ever take him seriously again, especially when it came to such topics as 9/11 truth.

Now, I know what you may be thinking: "MIND CONTROL?! That's the stuff of fiction!" Well, that's what I used to think. But, actually, it's not at all fictitious and its origins go all the way back to the 1950s when the CIA started a program called MKUltra (read about this program HERE). This program was an intensive effort to study ways in which an individual's mind could be altered and controlled by outside forces. Our government was mainly interested in doing this to counter mind-control techniques that the Russians/North Koreans/Chinese were supposedly doing on their own people. They also wanted to use it as an interrogation technique, hoping that there was a drug or some kind of psychological method that could be used to extract pure truth from a Russian spy or other detainee. But they also wanted to see if it was possible to turn a man into a pawn or robot, one who could then be used to assassinate enemies without remembering their actions afterwards. A man like this later came to be referred to as a "Manchurian Candidate", which we all know as a book and a movie but those works of fiction were actually based on some element of truth. 

Most of the CIA's mind-altering was accomplished through drugs like LSD or temazepam or mescalin. But there was also experimentation with hypnosis and torture-tactics like sleep deprivation, food deprivation, water-boarding etc., basically for the purpose of breaking down a man's mind and therefore making it easier to control. There was also talk of using sub-aural frequency blasts to erase the mind or alter its chemical balance in some way. And, later, there was talk of using microwaves for similar purposes.

The MKUltra program was supposedly halted in the 1970s but many believe that this was just a cover so that the CIA could continue to develop its mind-control techniques without the public crying about how unethical it was. The government knew that mind-control - however dangerous it may seem to be - could be extremely useful to them for a variety of reasons. Heck, it was the ultimate form of control over others. What more power do you need over people when you're able to control their minds, especially when these people are getting in your way, throwing a monkey wrench into your plans, like that pesky Charlie Sheen?

Of course, I'm not making any definite claims here but I think it's a strong possibility that Sheen's mind may have been altered by something more than just his own use of recreational drugs. And I'm not the only person to suspect this either. All you have to do is type the words "Charlie Sheen mind control" into the Google search engine and you'll find a good number of articles talking about the same possibility. The whole meltdown seemed way too fishy to so many people. How ironic it was that the most outspoken high-profile 9/11 "truther" just so happened to go bonkers in front of the entire world, exploited like some sort of freak for America's entertainment. It was all too convenient.

Charlie Sheen post-meltdown. Notice the change in overall demeanor and the look in his eyes.

Incidentally, Sheen isn't the first high-profile whistleblower that suspiciously suffered a meltdown immediately after causing the government problems. David Shayler - a former MI5 agent - blew the whistle on a botched attempt by the British government to assassinate Muammar al-Gaddafi in 1996 (they accidentally killed innocent civilians instead). Later, Shayler also spoke out about 9/11 being an inside job, a false-flag operation that the U.S. needed to stage in order to justify going into Iraq and Afghanistan and, ultimately, Iran and Syria. Not long after Shayler started being vocal about these events he gradually began to display very odd behavior, calling himself a messiah and deciding to become a transvestite (for more on Shayler's story, go to this article). Was the bizarre meltdown a coincidence? Maybe. Or maybe not...

But if Charlie Sheen really was the victim of mind-control, how was it done to him? Was he kidnapped and hypnotized? Slipped drugs somehow? Or perhaps it's more likely that microwaves were used to alter his mind. According to many sources, there is a field of antennas in Alaska that was created by the government somewhere around 1990. It's called HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and the antennas are suspected to possess the ability to pump silent frequencies into precise geographical locations and can alter people's emotional state, as well as transfer ideas and information. If you don't believe me, just Google "HAARP mind control" or watch Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory episode on HAARP or, even better, his newer episode entitled "Brain-Invaders".

I know all this sounds very far-fetched, but it may only be far-fetched because the MKUltra program has been kept hidden from us for so many years. Again, I wouldn't go so far as to make a definitive claim, but I would urge people to consider the possibility that mind-control was behind Charlie Sheen's public meltdown. I would also urge people to consider and be aware of MKUltra and mind-control techniques in general, which - in fact - may shed light on more mysteries than just the notorious Sheen meltdown. In fact, mind control may actually be a key piece of the 9/11 puzzle itself. Allow me to explain...

When people think about the possibility of 9/11 being an "inside job", they think about how difficult it would be to pull something so well-orchestrated off. The operation would have to involve a bunch of different people in several different professions. The hijackers would have to be "in on it". Demolition teams who rigged the buildings would have to be "in on it". Whoever confiscated the black boxes would have to be "in on it". So how could so many people be in on it and not say a peep afterwards? Even if they were paid outrageous amounts of money to keep their mouths shut, somebody's conscience - especially after ten years - would have to start eating away at them; somebody would most likely give into the guilt and start talking. But this hasn't happened. Nobody has come forward and said that they were somehow involved with this operation. So there's no way this could have been an inside job. Could it have??

Well, once we acknowledge the fact that programs like MKUltra exist and mind-control is a very real possibility, it's a little easier to believe that anybody who was "in on" the 9/11 events could have had their mind altered in a way so that they were unaware of their involvement. Whether it was demolition workers or the hijackers themselves, they could have simply just carried out their duties like robots and either died (in the case of the hijackers) or simply not remembered what they did afterwards (like in the case of demolition workers). Yes, I realize this all sounds fantastical, but if you're still skeptical about mind-control, watch another one of Jesse Ventura's episodes of Conspiracy Theory (entitled "Manchurian Candidate") where he talks about this very subject in even greater detail (watch it HERE). You will see a mind-control hypnosis demonstration and actually see an interview with a real life "super-soldier", a soldier used by the CIA to perform a number of missions while under hypnosis (none of which he fully remembers). Ventura also discusses the possibility of Sirhan Sirhan and Mark Chapman being Manchurian candidates under the influence of government mind-control (Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy and Chapman killed John Lennon). In fact, I don’t think it would be far-fetched of an idea to suggest that Aurora Colorado shooter James Holmes could have been under the influence of mind-control (read my previous blog “An Argument for the Second Amendment” to learn about the government's potential motive in orchestrating the Colorado attacks themselves). We all saw how drugged out Holmes was when he was first arraigned in court. His mind looked completely fried. And it's strange that he never had a police record or hurt a fly before he shot up that movie theater. But perhaps what's more eerie is that Holmes actually worked on writing mind-control programs as an intern at Salk Institute of Biological studies (read about this HERE). Mind-control was his field of study!

Once again, I know all this mind-control stuff seems very fantastic but I do feel it's something that the public needs to acknowledge and there also has to be some sort of public initiative to get the government to a) admit MKUltra is still alive and well and b) declassify its information about it. Putting Charlie Sheen's meltdown aside, I feel that mind-control could potentially be the last missing piece of the 9/11 puzzle, something "truthers" need to take a hard look at in order to get one step closer to figuring out what really happened on that fateful September day.